Thursday, January 28, 2010 - 7:45 PM
A $45 million USAID program aimed at improving the ability of Pakistani tribal leaders to govern a politically sensitive stretch of territory along the Afghan border has failed to achieve its primary mission of improving the delivery of basic services, according to an audit by the agency's inspector general.
The two year-old development program for the
Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) was designed to help improve living standards in one of Pakistan's poorest and most politically unstable territories.
So far, only $15.5 million has been spent on the initiative.
More specifically, the program -- which is run by Development
Alternatives, Inc. -- was set up in January 2008 to aid local government
officials and charities in developing the capacity to absorb the large amounts
of Western assistance that have flowed into the area to challenge the political
standing of the region's extremists.
It funds the activities of the FATA development
authority, which employs 100 people, and FATA secretariat, which oversees
nearly 30,000 local employees, including teachers and health- care workers. But
the "program has made little headway in achieving its two main goals,"
according to the audit.
"It has not achieved the goal of improving the capacity of FATA governmental
institutions to govern," according to the audit, which was produced by the
inspector general's office in Manila, the Philippines. And it "did not increase
the capacities of [local] NGOs to promote good governance, although some
progress was made."
The report cites some advances, including training in financial management and
program and development planning for 1,224 local officials. The program also
provided some training and office equipment for 42 nongovernmental
organizations.
The program has been plagued by a deteriorating security situation that has
prompted USAID to order Development Alternatives and other American contractors
to relocate to Islamabad from Peshawar, where a USAID official was killed in
November 2008.
The report says that the program was further delayed after the contractor's
chief representative resigned in September 2008, leaving the position vacant
until January 2009. It took 9 months to identify local charities to support,
and 400 computers purchased for government offices remain in unopened boxes.
Another 72 laptops were unaccounted for at the time of the audit.
In a response, USAID's Pakistan mission director, Robert J. Wilson, said the agency would seek to ensure the delivery
of the computers by the end of March. He said that 55 of 72 missing laptops
have been found and that USAID will bill the contractor and the Pakistani
authorities for the rest if they don't turn up.
The report also faults a change of political strategy by the Obama administration,
which is now calling for U.S. assistance to be channeled through local
charities, for placing the program in limbo.
In June, USAID refused to provide full funding for a $15.3 million request from
Development Alternatives as it began to rethink its practice of directing most
of its funds to U.S.-based contractors. In October, USAID asked the company to
prepare a plan to shut down its operations, but never made a decision to close
it.
In response to the audit, Wilson said that USAID had agreed in December to
extend Development Alternatives' contract through the end of 2010.
I am shocked, shocked to find that money spent in Pakistan can't be accounted for. LOL!!!!!
Actually that is exactly what I would expect, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if it part funds the insurgency.
But the big question is How and where is the money the US paid Pakistan to secure their Nuclear Weapons? And have they really been secured?
I think that aids programs should not be tied to anyone country. To do so lessons the impact that this great program provides. I think that the UN should montitor the funds, so that funds are used for the intented purpose. People are frustrated with giving funds when they are not used for the intent they are given. Peace will never be attained in the world when aid funds are used fro politcal purposes that only provide single interpritations. Agression and intimitation, never adds to peace. When the world comes to the relization that we live in the 21 century. We need answers that are 21 century and not from old world political thinking. I beleive that the world is headed toward one world, no borders and world business ventures that only help the one world cause for peace in the intire world. Each country acting as a seperate state, but globally connected.
Longtime Washington Post correspondent Colum Lynch reports on all things United Nations for Turtle Bay.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE