Tuesday, February 9, 2010 - 6:29 PM
For the next four years, the
United Nations' nerve center, including Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's office, will be situated in a
squat, three-story, corrugated steel building on the U.N.'s north lawn that
looks like a cross between a suburban big-box store and a high-security lockup
facility.
Bantánamo, a nickname embraced by U.N. staffers, has taken much of the grandeur
out of diplomacy at the United Nations. It's a serious comedown for U.N. civil
servants and delegates who have been grinding away in the cause of peace in one
of New York City's architectural landmarks, the glass and marble U.N.
headquarters tower and the U.N. General Assembly hall -- now undergoing a $1.87
billion renovation.
"The morale among the people in the secretary general's office has never been
lower," a U.N. official who works in the new building told Turtle Bay. "Everybody is profoundly depressed and demoralized
because they are put into windowless, airless cubicles that are completely
inhumane."
Some diplomats say the scaled-down, no-frills quarters send just the right
message for an organization that has been struggling to shake off a reputation
as wasteful. "It's stern and pragmatic but it's by no means ostentatious," said
Heraldo Muñoz, Chile's U.N.
ambassador, adding that governments, principally the United States, have
unfairly criticized the organization in the past and starved it of cash. "Being
in this temporary shelter reflects the state of the U.N. I feel we should be
able to put it up with it for a few years."
The original U.N. headquarters compound was built in the early 1950s by a
committee of internationally renowned architects, including the Swiss-French
modernist Le Corbusier and Brazilian
Oscar Niemeyer, who intended it to
serve as a temple to international peacemaking, elevating the role of U.N.
civil servants and delegates to a kind of diplomatic priesthood.
"Every time I come into that building I feel a sense of awe," said Stephen Schlesinger, author of The Act of Creation, which chronicles
the founding of the United Nations. "It's now been reduced to a pile of
shipping crates. This will diminish the United Nations."
There is little debate about the need for a full-fledged renovation of the U.N.
headquarters compound, which has been showing its age. The elegant corridors
linking the Security Council to the General Assembly chamber are riddled with
leaks that let in rainwater. The heating and air conditioning systems are
wildly inefficient, requiring a sweater to ward off the cold at the height of
summer. The walls are filled with asbestos. Last year, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's sister, Marjorie Tiven, who heads the city's
liaison officer with the U.N., threatened to shut down public tours of the U.N.
because of rampant violations of local fire safety codes.
The new headquarters' airy industrial interior, with exposed air conditioning
ducts on the ceiling and poured concrete floors, bears more of a resemblance to
Wal-Mart or Ikea -- two other popular nicknames for the temporary space -- than
to the U.N.'s original buildings.
The new building sits atop what was a large U.N. garden filled with statues from around the world. The crew was unable to move the largest statue, a 40-ton depiction of St. George slaying the dragon of nuclear war, and built around it. The statue -- built by the Soviet sculptor Zurab Tsereteli and entitled Good Defeats Evil -- is held in place by a massive concrete base and was constructed out of scrapped sections of U.S. Pershing and Soviet SS-20 nuclear missiles.
Niemeyer, now 102 years old and
the only surviving U.N. architect, was appalled by the construction of the new
building on the U.N.'s north lawn, and has advised the United Nations to take
it down as soon as the renovation is complete. The U.N. says the new building
has been constructed with Niemeyer's request in mind.
"It wasn't designed to be permanent or to be elegant or to be exotic," said Michael Adlerstein, a New York
architect who built Bantánamo for $140 million and was appointed by Ban in 2007
to oversee the U.N. headquarters renovation. "It was designed to be
functional."
At a ribbon-cutting ceremony
last month, Ban celebrated the building's lack of pretension, noting that
"there are no escalators. The windows are limited. We have simple concrete
floors. No carpets."
Ban later acknowledged that there were, actually, some carpets, and some wood
paneling, in his personal office -- "minimum decorations for the courtesy of
visiting dignitaries and V.I.P.'s," he said.
Not everyone has it so good. The General Assembly president, Libya's Ali Abdussalam Treki, who also needs to
meet with world leaders, was annoyed to discover he and his staff were to be
crammed into a small set of offices that could only be reached by way of a dark
concrete corridor.
Werner Schmidt, the spokesman for
Adlerstein, declined to discuss Treki's concerns. But he acknowledged: "We are
making some adjustments to the offices of the president of the General Assembly
in accordance with his wishes." It is not unusual, he added, for "a high-level
occupant" in any new building to find that "certain things can be improved."
Mid-level U.N. officials have groused at having to give up window offices with
views of the East River and midtown Manhattan for the sunless cubicles. They
are particularly bitter that the Group of 77, a loose but powerful alliance of
more than 130 developing countries, has been given a fairly large space in the new
building. In contrast, the U.N. General Assembly affairs office, which is
responsible for organizing meetings in the building, has been moved to a space
two blocks away from the U.N. compound, a 42nd street office above a luggage
store. "It was blackmail," said one U.N. official, noting that the G-77 has
used its influence on the U.N.'s main budgetary committee to exact a spacious
set of offices.
The group's chairman, Sudanese ambassador Abdalmahmood
Abdalhaleem Mohamad, said he "fought hard" to make a case for office space
in the building. But he insisted there was no undue pressure. "We are an
important actor in the U.N."
Muñoz cited a more practical problem with the new digs. "There is a lot of
confusion," Muñoz said. "I found myself in the corridors of the new building
meeting with other ambassadors and members of the U.N. secretariat. They know
they have to go meet someone and don't know where the heck they are located."
"Everybody is profoundly depressed and demoralized because they are put into windowless, airless cubicles that are completely inhumane."
Well get out of the office. Inhumane is what the peacekeepers downrange see on a daily basis.
"It's stern and pragmatic but it's by no means ostentatious," said Heraldo Muñoz, Chile's U.N. ambassador, adding that governments, principally the United States, have unfairly criticized the organization in the past and starved it of cash. "
Who's paying for the renovations? Who has prime real estate in NYC? Who pays the rent on that prime real estate?
"Niemeyer, now 102 years old and the only surviving U.N. architect, was appalled by the construction of the new building on the U.N.'s north lawn, and has advised the United Nations to take it down as soon as the renovation is complete. The U.N. says the new building has been constructed with Niemeyer's request in mind."
Appalled? He must not have gotten out much in his day. I've seen some pretty appalling things, especially while in Somalia as a ground troop under the blue flag. Building a temp structure around a statue is not my definition of appalling. It sounds to me like these folks are drunk with power and have lost sight of the mission and their reason for existence.
"there are no escalators. The windows are limited. We have simple concrete floors. No carpets."
Sounds like how the peacekeepers downrange live, except for the windows part of course. Normally those are blow out or bullet riddled.
Inhumane?
That kind of prissy overblown language is annoying; if things get really inhumane, they can always step out for a steak lunch or the like courtesy of the US taxpayer.
How is it the courtesy of the US taxpayer? Did you ever consider which contractors will be the recipient of the 1.86B renovation money?
and what's wrong with steak? it's delicious
"Some diplomats say the scaled-down, no-frills quarters send just the right message for an organization that has been struggling to shake off a reputation as wasteful."
As they order a $1.87 billion renovation... FOR WHAT!
We wouldn't want them to work in 'inhumane' offices (which they probably spend about one day a month in)--you see UN diplomats live just like Gitmo detainees.........
Because the place is falling apart.
Sure you can compare HQ to every shithole around the world but with parts of the basement roof collapse would I think, be a cause of concern.
If the UN did spend a considerable amount on temporary digs the article would then be complaining about the money wasted.
Longtime Washington Post correspondent Colum Lynch reports on all things United Nations for Turtle Bay.
Read More
(8)
SHOW COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE