Thursday, March 4, 2010 - 7:15 PM

The diplomatic maneuvering is
going into high gear as the United States and its allies seek to pass sanctions
on Iran and come up against resistance not just from China but from some less
obvious antagonists, principally Brazil, Lebanon, and Turkey. As the debate
heats up, the potential for a sharply divided vote on a sanctions resolution is
increasing -- an outcome unlikely to please anyone.
According to U.N. diplomats, Lebanon has made it clear that it will not be in a
position to support any sanctions resolution against Iran, which has provided
military and political support to the military group Hezbollah, an influential
faction in the government.
In a show of defiance, Hezbollah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, made a rare public
appearance in Damascus with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Syrian
leader Bashar al-Assad. "Lebanon for internal reasons is unlikely to vote for a
sanctions resolution," a senior diplomat said. "I suppose they would rather
avoid taking a clear yes-or-no stand on this issue."
Turkey and Brazil have also been hesitant to back sanctions against Iran. In
November, the two countries abstained
on a vote by the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censoring
Iran for its secret construction of a nuclear facility in Qom. U.N. diplomats
fear they will do the same on this vote, particularly if China does.
China and Russia pressured Tehran to agree to an offer to swap its enriched
uranium for a foreign supply of nuclear fuel for its medical research reactor. Their
appeals -- delivered during a U.N. Security Council meeting on nuclear nonproliferation
-- presented Tehran with a final chance to skirt U.N. sanctions.
Russia's U.N. ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, said that while diplomatic efforts by
the U.N. and the big powers "have not yielded the desired results," there "is
still a horizon for negotiations. There is still an opportunity to agree to a
persuasive mutually acceptable fuel exchange model for Tehran's research
reactor."
Churkin said that Tehran acceptance of the deal would constitute a "credible
step" towards restoring international trust in the "peaceful nature of Iran's
nuclear program." It remained unclear whether an Iranian commitment to accept
the fuel exchange deal would halt the West's push for sanctions. But U.N.
diplomats said it would greatly strengthen Beijing and Moscow's call for
continued talks.
China's deputy U.N. ambassador Liu Zhenmin underscored Beijing's desire to see
the nuclear standoff resolved through diplomatic negotiations, telling the
council "we believe that sanctions are not an end in themselves and in no way
can they provide a fundamental solution to this issue."
But he also reaffirmed that China remains committed to supporting the "dual
track strategy" -- negotiations and sanctions -- and he urged Tehran to step up
cooperation with the IAEA to "remove doubts" about the suspected military
nature of Iran's nuclear program, Liu said.
"We believe the key to easing the current tense situation around this issue
remains the proper solution of supply of nuclear fuel for the Tehran research
reactors and the relaunching of P-5 negotiations as soon as possible with
Iran," Liu said.
"The door to contact and
dialogue has not closed," he added. "There's still room for further diplomatic
maneuver."
The United States and its European allies are confident that they can secure at
least 10 votes, including from nonpermanent members Austria, Bosnia, Gabon,
Mexico, Nigeria, and Uganda -- one more than the nine required for passage in
the council. But the failure to secure a united front, particularly from the
five veto-wielding members of the council, would send a weak signal to the
Iranians, diplomats said.
U.S. and European officials are eager to have the resolution adopted before a
May 4-15 review conference on the 1970 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which
sets the basic rules governing the use of nuclear weapons. One senior diplomat
directly involved in the nuclear negotiations said that open-ended debate on
Iran could "contaminate the atmosphere" there.
The official said that Obama's meeting
with the Dalai Lama was "not very conducive" to the talks, but that Beijing may
ultimately come around to sanctions: "This is not the last word out of Beijing.
We have a good chance that the Chinese position might evolve."
Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg held talks in
Beijing with senior Chinese officials this week, but a Chinese foreign ministry
spokesman reiterated after his departure that China believed that diplomacy had
not been exhausted. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said Steinberg
raised concerns about Iran's nuclear program.
Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has sought to position his
government as a key power broker in the Middle East, mediating disputes between
Israel and Syria and looking for a similar role in Iran. But Turkish diplomats
are concerned that a vote for sanctions would jeopardize its ability to play
the role of an honest broker. "They have really raised their level of
diplomatic engagement quite dramatically over the last years, and the Erdogan
government feels that it has a privileged relation to Tehran," said a senior
ambassador involved in the talks.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva is seeking to position his
government as a leader of the developing world, which often sees sanctions as a
Western tool of pressure against poor countries. In New York, Brazilian diplomats
have voiced concern to their counterparts that the resolution might deprive
Iran of its right to possess nuclear power, according to a council diplomat.
On Wednesday, while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in Brazil, Lula da
Silva urged the United States and its allies to continue to pursue negotiations
with Iran. "It is not prudent to push Iran against a wall," Lula da Silva told
reporters in Brasilia. "The prudent thing is to establish negotiations."
"I want for Iran the same thing I want for Brazil: to use the development of
nuclear energy for peaceful purposes," said Lula da Silva, who will visit Iran
in May. "If Iran agrees with that, Iran will have the support of Brazil."
In recent days, the United States, Britain, France, and Germany reached
agreement on a set of sanctions targeting Iran's banking, insurance, and
shipping sectors that they hope to include in a U.N. sanctions resolution. They
are awaiting a response from Russia and China.
Churkin told Turtle Bay on Thursday
that he has not received a formal response to the proposals from Moscow, and
that he has no authority to begin substantive negotiations on sanctions.
But on Tuesday he voiced his country's growing weariness over nuclear
negotiations with Iran, saying that Tehran has failed to provide "the
appropriate responses that we expected" to peace offerings from the big powers.
"Unfortunately, Tehran turned this around to the point where there was no
longer any possibility for dialogue. We regret that."
"We are concerned by what we see," Churkin said. "We are concerned by the
concerns expressed by IAEA. We are guided by the IAEA; we respect the IAEA, so
when they are not satisfied with what they see in their cooperation we are
obviously also very concerned and this adds up to things which raise worries
about the nature of their nuclear program."
Incredible lack of credibility
We may have to consider that we have shot our credibility on the WMD thing and predators on top of our covert cold war CIA stinger against the Soviet Union using Afghanistan for cannon fodder! It may just happen that our super ego is getting in our own way these days...
Longtime Washington Post correspondent Colum Lynch reports on all things United Nations for Turtle Bay.
Read More
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE