Thursday, July 1, 2010 - 5:53 PM

A top Russian diplomat, Yuri V. Fedotov, has emerged as the front-runner in the race to become the U.N.'s new drug czar, overseeing an agency with a $250 million budget and setting the stage for a potential clash with the United States and its NATO allies over counternarcotics strategy in Afghanistan, according to senior U.N.-based officials.
Fedotov, Russia's ambassador to the United Kingdom, is expected to take over the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime at the end of July, when Antonio Maria Costa, steps down. The appointment -- which is to be made by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon -- would bring an end to a string of Italians who have run the organization for decades, and it would place Russia in a far more influential position to influence the international war on drugs.
Russia's bid for the top U.N. anti-drug post comes as the country is confronting one of the world's fasting-growing heroin addiction and HIV infection rates, primarily driven by its more than 1.8 million intravenous drug users. Moscow has taken a hard line on its approach to drugs, banning the use of methadone and buprenorphine, refusing to fund its own needle-exchange programs, and advocating an intensification of eradication of Afghan poppy production. NATO officials believe it is using the drug issue as a way of extending its own influence inside Afghanistan.
The tough line contrasts with the approach being pursued by the Obama administration, NATO allies and the United Nations, which favor crop substitution programs and the pursuit of drug traffickers. The U.S. -- a leading proponent of opium eradication during the Bush administration -- has shifted gears since 2009. "Eradication is a waste of money," Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said last year. "It might destroy some acreage, but it didn't reduce the amount of money the Taliban got by one dollar. It just helped the Taliban. So we're going to phase out eradication."
But Russia has not been impressed. In a speech to the Security Council in March, Russia's U.N. ambassador Vitaly I. Churkin expressed concern at reports that the U.S.-led coalition was planning to "cease destroying poppy fields," saying "there is a growing link between the terrorists in that country and the drug traffickers." He urged the council to expand the U.N,'s role in combating drugs, a strategy that would give Russia a greater say over the issue.
"There is no doubt today that the Afghan drug trade represents a direct, serious threat to international peace and security," Churkin said. "Therefore we must neutralize collectively, and use all available means to do so. How can we overcome the Taliban's military potential when it continues to obtain financial resources from the illegal drug trade?"
Despite their differences, the United States and Russia have been working to improve their coordination in battling the drug trade. Last year, U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev established a presidential task force to combat drug trafficking. Viktor P. Ivanov, the director of Russia's Federal Drug Enforcement Service, and R. Gil Kerlikowske, the director of the Office of the National Drug Control Policy, have agreed to share intelligence on interdiction efforts in Afghanistan and Central Asia. U.N.-based officials say the United States has raised no objections to Fedotov's appointment.
The competition for the U.N.'s top drug job has played out in secret. Officials familiar with the process say that there are more than 20 potential candidates. Fedotov -- who would be the only Russian head of a major U.N. agency -- has emerged at the top of a short list that includes a Spanish lawyer, Carlos Castresana, who recently resigned as the head of a U.N. anti-crime commission in Guatemala, Carlos Holmes Trujillo, Colombia's ambassador to the European Union, and a 29-year-old Brazilian lawyer, Pedro Abramovay.
Fedotov has been generally well regarded at the United Nations, where he served as then Russian ambassador Sergei Lavrov's deputy. Fedotov also acted as Russia's representative on the commission overseeing the U.N. weapons inspectors in Iraq. He managed U.N. affairs in the Russian foreign ministry, before being assigned to head Russia's embassy in Britain. But Fedotov has no background in combating drugs or crime.
The appointment of a career Russian diplomat has raised concern among some of Washington's NATO allies and private drug treatment and HIV advocacy groups, who fear Fedotov may used the position to promote Russia's national positions. Still, diplomats say they are unlikely to antagonize Russia by openly opposing its candidate.
Activists contend that Moscow's policy on critical issues -- including a hard-line approach to drug eradication programs and methadone treatment among drug users -- are out of step with U.N. approaches. They say Russia has previously used high-level appointments in international drug agencies to advance its own policies.
Drug-treatment proponents cite the case of Russia's representative to the International Drug Control Board, Tatyana Dmitrieva, who allegedly advocated Russian positions on the independent board, which is responsible for interpreting international treaties designed to curb the illicit drug trade.
"We question Ms Dmitrieva's independence from the Russian government which has nominated her, as she holds what are essentially government positions," Mike Trace, chair of the International Drug Policy Consortium wrote in a May 2009 letter that called for blocking her election. "Ms Dmitrieva routinely espouses positions of the Russian government on drug policy, even when they are not based on any scientific evidence." In 2005, Trace wrote, Dmitrieva co-signed a paper entitled "NO to methadone programs in Russia" that was published in a Russian newspaper for medical professionals, Meditsinskaya Gazeta. The paper included "inaccuracies, half-truths about methadone, proclaiming methadone unsafe and ineffective," he wrote. Dmitrieva succeed in her reelection bid, but died in March 2009.
U.N. diplomats said that there is no reason to believe that Fedotov would not act independently, citing other former government officials who hold high-level U.N. positions, including Anthony Lake, the new executive director of the U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF). Like Fedotov, Lake was the official U.S. candidate for the post.
Fedotov's appointment would make him the only Russian to currently run a major U.N. agency. Traditionally, such positions go to those countries that make large donations to the agencies. But Lavrov, now Russia's foreign minister, has been pressing Ban for years to give more senior posts to Russians, saying they are underrepresented at the highest levels of the U.N. bureaucracy. If Ban hopes to be reelected to a second term next year, he will need the support of Russia, which has veto power.
Follow me on Twitter: @columlynch.
Prohibition is a threat to international peace and security!
Like it or not, there has never been, and nor will there ever be, a drug-free society; the use of addictive or recreational drugs is a natural part of human existence. Nobody here is claiming that any substance is beneficial for either the individual or society. It is true however that certain substances help the soul heal and relieve pain while others provide short-term relief from a monotonous existence at the risk of possible long-term health problems.
America 1919-1933 experienced a bloody era of violence and killings that started to decline only when the Volstead Act was finally repealed.
Why was it ever enacted? Because the first feminist movement in the United States, the Women's Temperance Union, bolstered by church and other social engineering movements argued correctly that alcohol was extremely addictive and led to family distress, unemployment and violence against women and children.
In 1923 the executive council of the American Federation of Labor issued an address to the American people after an exhaustive investigation of the effects of the Volstead Act. It was shown by this investigation that there had been–––
A general disregard of the law among all classes of people, including those who made the law.
Creation of thousands of moonshiners among both country and city dwellers.
The creation of an army of bootleggers.
An amazing increase in the traffic in poisons and deadly concoctions and drugs.
An increased rate of insanity, blindness, and crime among the users of these concoctions and drugs.
Increase in taxes to city, State, and National Government amounting to approximately $1,000,000,000 per year.
Source: THE NATIONAL PROHIBITION LAW HEARINGS April 5 to 24, 1926
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/e1920/senj1926/roberts.html
Since prohibition was repealed, there have still been problems with alcohol addiction along with associated health issues, but the vast majority of people's drinking has not led to the downfall of society. If we can handle the regulation of alcohol, one of the most powerful, addictive and dangerous of drugs, we can handle just about anything, and that includes cocaine and amphetamines.
And everything is readily available right now to all of us anyway. Drugs of all varieties are cheap and plentiful, and the basic economics of drug dealing remain: Take one dealer off the street, and another takes his place. Something that simply doesn't happen for other more real crimes, such as murder, embezzlement or burglary.
Historically, the prohibition of any mind altering substance has never succeeded in providing what is needed, which is a safer environment for the addict, the family and society at large. It always has, and always will, spawn far worse conditions than those it claims to be able to alleviate.
An important aspect of Individual freedom is the right to do with yourself as you please as long as your actions cause no unnecessary suffering or direct harm to others. Many among us may disagree with this, and they should be free to believe what they wish, but the moment they are willing to use force to impose their will on the rest of us, is the exact same moment that the petty criminals/dealers, the Mafia, drug barons, terrorists and corrupt government officials/agencies enter the equation. The problems created by self harm then rapidly pale into insignificance as society spirals downwards into a dark abyss, while the most shady characters and 'black-market corporate entities' exponentially enrich themselves in a feeding frenzy likened to that of piranhas on bath-tub meth.
Longtime Washington Post correspondent Colum Lynch reports on all things United Nations for Turtle Bay.
Read More
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE