Tuesday, August 10, 2010 - 3:01 PM
Whenever tragedy strikes in some far-off land, the world's top diplomat, U.N. Secretary- General Ban Ki-moon, customarily sends off a note conveying the world's sympathies, a practice that shows that country is not alone. But with so many natural disasters, conflicts, and humanitarian crises unfolding at once, the U.N. chief needs to be efficient. And so his staff has apparently developed a standard response that can be used in the event of any crisis. Just change the name of the country, the nature of the disaster, and hit send.
For instance, Ban said almost exactly the same thing in response to a fire in Russia, landslides in China, and flooding in Pakistan:
Statement Attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on Fires in the Russian Federation
The Secretary-General is saddened by the loss of life and suffering caused by the fires that have affected the territory of the Russian Federation outside Moscow. He extends his deepest condolences to the families of those who have died or been injured.
The Secretary-General is aware of the tremendous efforts being undertaken by the Government of the Russian Federation to bring the situation under control. He reaffirms the commitment of the United Nations to assist in any way in this effort should it be required.
Statement Attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on Floods and Landslides in China
The Secretary-General is saddened by the loss of life and devastation caused by the severe flooding that has affected considerable portions of China. He extends his deepest condolences to the families of those who have died or been injured or lost their homes and possessions.
The Secretary-General is aware of the tremendous efforts being undertaken by the Government of China to evacuate people out of harm's way, to carry out search and rescue operations, and to respond to needs arising from this situation. He reaffirms the commitment of the United Nations to assist in any way in this effort should it be required.
The statement for Pakistan is slightly different, reflecting a greater U.N. role:
Secretary-General Deeply Saddened by Loss of Lives, Livelihoods Following Pakistan Floods, Pledges UN Support to Meet Humanitarian Needs
The Secretary-General is deeply saddened by the significant loss of lives, livelihoods, and infrastructure in Pakistan, following the recent heavy monsoon rains that have caused the worst floods in the last 80 years, affecting more than 1 million people.
The Secretary-General offers his deepest condolences to the people and Government of Pakistan and reiterates the United Nations full commitment to supporting the national and provincial authorities in meeting the humanitarian needs of the population affected.
In addition to the aid the United Nations is already providing, the Secretary-General is authorising the disbursement of up to $10 million from the Central Emergency Response Fund to help address the pressing needs of the population.
The condolence template is by no means an innovation of the current U.N. leadership. Here's a letter from Kofi Annan on October, 11, 2005, after a devastating earthquake ripped through Pakistan:
Secretary-General, Deeply Saddened by South-Asia Earthquake, Says UN Relief Agency in Contact with Concerned Governments on Assistance PlansThe Secretary-General is deeply saddened by the loss of life and destruction caused by the earthquake that hit Pakistan, with impact extending into India and Afghanistan, on the morning of 8 October 2005, and extends his sincere condolences to all the victims and their families.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs is in contact with the Governments of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan to explore ways in which the United Nations can assist in all efforts required to support relief and rescue operations and in subsequent recovery and reconstruction.
Please follow me on Twitter @columlynch.
It looks like moon at least prepared the statements himself
US selected Ban to be UN Secretary General
Poor UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon! Being a non-English speaking UN Secretary General selected by US to lead UN, has hard time coming up with different phraseology to express his sorrow for multiple human tragedies occurring in the world.
Obviously US wanted a secretary general that will dance to its tune and so supported such a lame person to be UN Secretary General over say, India’s candidate at the time.
hah Indian candidate would have had to be removed later
for having so many divorces.
Moon is OK. It is the UN which is losing its relevance.
Looks like his communication dept stinks..........
I see we at least have our priorities straight.
lalqila.wordpress.com
Longtime Washington Post correspondent Colum Lynch reports on all things United Nations for Turtle Bay.
Read More
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE