Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna's visit last week to the United Nations was supposed to provide New Delhi with an opportunity to shine on the world stage, to show that India is a serious emerging power that deserves to sit with other world powers. It didn’t quite turn out that way.

Krishna, in his first appearance before the U.N. Security Council since his country began a two-year stint in January as a temporary member of the U.N. security body, read the wrong speech. For three minutes, Krishna read from the official statement of the foreign minister of Portugal, Luis Amado, noting with a gracious smile his "satisfaction regarding the happy coincidence of having two members of the Portuguese speaking countries" addressing the 15-nation council." (See the video: Krishna begans at 1:08:10)

The gaffe has fueled calls from India's opposition politicians to have Krishna step down, saying his mistake has brought "shame" to India at a time when it is trying to prove to the world that it is a serious player on the world stage.

The mistake occurred after Amado, who spoke before Krishna, decided to ditch his speech in favor of extemporaneous remarks on the theme of the council debate: the connection between social development and security. Copies of his official speech, however, were circulated to the council's members, including one copy that landed on top of Krishna's speech.

In all fairness, it is often tough to tell the difference between the standard speeches delivered before the U.N. Security Council. The Portuguese statement sounded off familiar themes that could have been read by virtually any delegation. For instance, it noted that it "is impossible to implement effective poverty reduction strategies" in a place wracked by political chaos and violence. It underscored the importance of meeting the Millennium Development Goals -- a series of internationally accepted health and poverty benchmarks aimed at eliminating poverty -- in order to spur economic development in the Third World.

It was not until Krishna highlighted the importance of coordination between the United Nations and the European Union that the Indian delegation grew suspicious. India's U.N. ambassador, Hardeep Singh Puri, approached Krishna, slid the Portuguese text off his pile of paper, and instructed him to read the Indian statement buried beneath it. "OK," a puzzled Krishna said before asking: "I have to start all over again?" Without so much as a pause, or a recognition of the gaffe, Krishna started again, beginning with a reference to Mahatma Gandhi's famous line "poverty is the worst form of violence." You'd think -- that if he had taken the time to glance at his speech before reading it -- he would have noticed the omission.

As for Krishna, he suggested the slip-up could have happened to anyone. "There was nothing wrong in it," he told the Press Trust of India. "There were so many papers spread in front of me, so by mistake the wrong speech was taken out."

Follow me on Twitter @columlynch

*Update, 11:37 a.m., Feb. 14, 2011: This quote was corrected along with corrections of misspelled names and typographical errors.

 

RAYMOND TURNEY

12:54 PM ET

February 14, 2011

Funny, But Probably Unimportant

Hi,

Wonder if the guy operating the equipment that showed Krishgna the speech he delivered was either a Pakistani or a BJP supporter? This sounds like result of one of the old comic tricks from US politicial campaigns back in the 1960's.

India's two years in the Security Council are likely to increase frustration in India, though. A lot of Indians think India should be a permanent member of the Security Council, and the signs are that the Chinese do not agree. So when the Indians expect their temporary seat to become permanent, and it doesn't seem to be happening, there will probably be some tensions.

But there is no need to write a paper about South Asia here,. Anyone who wants to read more from me can read my blog at:

http://rememberjenkinsear.blogspot.com/

 

THE GLOBALIZER

3:44 PM ET

February 15, 2011

Rule number 1...

...make sure you've got your **** straight.

The content was probably irrelevant, but it's the principle, folks.

 

KHALID RAHIM

5:28 AM ET

February 16, 2011

The road to permanent seat? Kashmir.

If the sponsors of India to the permanent seat at the Security Council want their mission to succeed. They have to through honest means and no hanky panky solve the Kashmir issue.

 

KOOLINVSTR

6:54 AM ET

February 17, 2011

kashmir ?

why do you want to bring down kashmir along with you? your internal policies are flawed and so are your foreign policies... its time you stop crying foul and gave up this kashmir business !

 

Longtime Washington Post correspondent Colum Lynch reports on all things United Nations for Turtle Bay.

Read More